Logical pluralism posits that multiple, equally valid logics exist, each capturing different facets of reasoning and argumentation. It challenges the…
Logical monism asserts that a single, universally correct logic governs all valid reasoning. This viewpoint contrasts with logical pluralism, suggesting…
Logical antirealism posits that logical truths aren't objective facts about reality. Instead, they arise from human conventions, language, or our…
A paradox in epistemic logic concerning self-reference, where a statement claims its own unprovability or unknowability, leading to logical contradictions.
A paradox where the truth of a statement implies its knowability. This epistemic puzzle, particularly in modal logic, raises questions…
In rebus vagueness posits that vagueness is an inherent property of reality itself, not merely a limitation of our language…
Inferentialism posits that a statement's meaning arises from the rules governing its use and the logical inferences it permits. It…
Exploring the individual as an indivisible, atomistic entity in metaphysics, logic, and philosophy of language. Understanding its fundamental role in…
This argument posits that if mathematical entities are essential for our most successful scientific theories, we should accept their existence.…
Quine's theory posits that empirical evidence alone cannot establish a single, correct translation between languages. Multiple translations are often equally…