currency

Currency Costs Order: UK Supreme Court Upholds Nigeria’s Win

In a significant legal development on October 22, 2025, the UK Supreme Court has delivered a decisive blow to P&ID, rejecting their plea to overturn a crucial decision regarding the currency of a costs order. This ruling solidifies Nigeria’s victory in the set-aside proceedings, marking another chapter in the protracted legal battle.

The intricate legal landscape surrounding the P&ID case continues to evolve, with the latest Supreme Court judgment focusing on the specific financial terms governing the costs awarded. Understanding the implications of this decision, particularly concerning the currency of payments, is vital for legal professionals and those following international arbitration and sovereign disputes.

Supreme Court’s Stance on Currency of Costs

The UK Supreme Court’s decision unequivocally supports Nigeria’s position concerning the currency in which the costs order should be settled. This means that P&ID’s attempt to challenge the established terms of payment has been dismissed, reinforcing the original judgment that favoured Nigeria.

What Does This Mean for P&ID?

For P&ID, this rejection signifies a setback in their efforts to alter the financial obligations stemming from the set-aside proceedings. The court’s affirmation of the original costs order, including its specified currency, means they must adhere to the terms as previously determined.

Nigeria’s Continued Legal Momentum

This ruling further bolsters Nigeria’s legal standing in the ongoing dispute. By successfully defending the terms of the costs order, the nation demonstrates its commitment to upholding legal processes and protecting its national interests against what it considers an unjust award.

Understanding Set-Aside Proceedings and Costs Orders

Set-aside proceedings are legal mechanisms where a party seeks to have an arbitral award or court decision nullified. When such proceedings are initiated, courts often have the power to award costs to the successful party. These costs can include legal fees, disbursements, and other expenses incurred during the litigation.

The determination of the currency for these costs is a critical detail. It can significantly impact the actual amount payable, especially in cases involving international parties where exchange rate fluctuations can be substantial. Nigeria’s success in this instance highlights the importance of precise financial stipulations in legal judgments.

Key Factors in the Supreme Court’s Decision

While the full judgment details are extensive, the Supreme Court’s decision likely hinged on established legal principles regarding the interpretation and enforcement of court orders. Factors considered would include:

• The original wording of the costs order.
• The legal arguments presented by both Nigeria and P&ID.
• Precedents set in similar cases involving international costs.

The court’s focus on the currency aspect underscores how even seemingly minor details can have significant financial ramifications in high-stakes international legal battles.

The P&ID Saga: A Brief Overview

The Gas Supply and Processing Agreement (GSPA) between P&ID and Nigeria, intended to process natural gas, became the subject of a contentious arbitration. P&ID was awarded a colossal sum of over $6 billion in damages, which Nigeria successfully challenged and had set aside by a UK court. The subsequent set-aside proceedings, and the associated costs, have been a focal point of ongoing legal scrutiny.

The dispute has drawn considerable international attention due to its sheer scale and the implications for investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. This latest ruling on the currency of costs adds another layer to this complex narrative.

Lessons Learned from the Currency Dispute

This development offers several key takeaways for parties involved in international arbitration and litigation:

1. Precision in Orders: Ensure all court orders, especially those involving financial settlements, are meticulously drafted with no ambiguity regarding the currency.
2. Strategic Legal Defence: A robust and well-supported legal defence, as demonstrated by Nigeria, is crucial in challenging or upholding legal decisions.
3. Understanding Exchange Rate Risks: Parties should be acutely aware of potential exchange rate fluctuations and how they might affect payment obligations.

The UK Supreme Court’s decision on the currency of the costs order is a clear victory for Nigeria, reinforcing the integrity of the legal process and the importance of adhering to established financial terms. As the P&ID saga continues, this judgment serves as a significant marker, demonstrating the courts’ commitment to upholding their rulings.

What’s Next?

With the Supreme Court’s decision on the currency of costs now settled, the focus will likely shift to the practical enforcement of these orders. Nigeria will aim to collect the costs as stipulated, while P&ID must now comply with the definitive ruling. The broader implications for international arbitration and the financial liabilities of parties involved will continue to be a subject of discussion and analysis.

For more insights into international arbitration and legal rulings, explore resources like the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) or official UK court publications.

The UK Supreme Court’s decisive action on the currency of costs in the P&ID case underscores the importance of clarity and adherence to legal stipulations. Nigeria’s successful defence of its position marks a significant development in this high-profile dispute.

UK Supreme Court rejects P&ID’s request to reverse decision on currency of costs order in set-aside proceedings lodged by Nigeria. Get the full details.

UK Supreme Court P&ID Nigeria costs order currency set-aside proceedings October 22 2025 legal ruling international arbitration financial dispute